(1)“防排结合“防水设防
(1) "anti platoon combination" waterproof fortification
从国际应用情况来看,“防排结合”防水的可靠度较高,但受制于高昂的直接投入、长期的使用维护成本、施工工期较长和持续降水对临近建筑结构稳定性的影响等因素,在国内民用建筑中较少采用,多见于暗挖隧道。
According to the international application, the waterproofing
reliability of the combination of prevention and drainage is high, but
it is seldom used in civil buildings, especially in tunnels dug in the
dark, because of the high direct investment, long-term maintenance cost,
long construction period and the influence of continuous precipitation
on the stability of nearby buildings.
(2)“雨衣式”防水设防
(2) raincoat type waterproof fortification
国内传统防水设防类似“雨衣式”防水,立足于如何实现防水层的完整性,如强调“搭接”、“交圈”等,力求防水层能做到“天衣无缝”。很显然,忽视防水层与结构层之间是否粘结风险极大,因为防水层一旦出现任何薄弱点,造成地下水在防水层与结构层之间窜流,足以造成防水系统的局部或整体崩溃,这种情况下防水层形同虚设,渗漏数量完全由结构混凝土裂缝数量决定。
Traditional waterproof fortifications in China are similar to
"raincoat" waterproofing, which is based on how to achieve the integrity
of the waterproof layer, such as emphasizing "overlap" and "circle" to
make the waterproof layer "seamless". Obviously, ignoring the bonding
risk between the waterproof layer and the structural layer is extremely
risky, because the waterproof layer once there is any weakness, causing
groundwater to flow between the waterproof layer and the structural
layer, enough to cause the local or overall collapse of the waterproof
system, in this case the waterproof layer is nothing, the amount of
leakage is entirely from the structural concrete. The number of cracks
is determined.
PVC, SBS and EPDM are the most typical waterproofing methods in
basement floor in China. They can not bond with cushion, and can not
bond with post-poured concrete. It is easy to cause water leakage. This
method has the disadvantages of high leakage rate and long-term
continuous grouting.
因此,“雨衣式”防水设防并不适合用于以现浇混凝土为主体的防水工程,更适合用于外露式屋面等工程。
Therefore, the "raincoat" waterproof fortification is not suitable
for the waterproof projects with cast-in-place concrete as the main
body, more suitable for exposed roof projects.